Lisbon Regional School (Elem)
24 Highland Ave Lisbon NH, 03585, Grafton County Phone: 603-838-5506 Ranking: (209 out of 355, bottom 41%)* Type: Regular Primary School Status: Currently Operational Grade: Kindergarten to Grade 5 School District: Lisbon Regional School District Title I Eligible School: Yes School-Wide Title I: NA Magnet: NA Charter: NA Shared-Time School: NA |
Students and Teachers
2013-2014 | 2012-2013 | 2011-2012 | 2010-2011 | 2009-2010 | 2008-2009 | 2007-2008 | ||||||||
Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | |
Total Teachers: | 17 | 18 | 17 | 16 | 15 | 15 | 14 | |||||||
Total Students: | 135 | 144 | 143 | 143 | 146 | 153 | 150 | |||||||
Kindergarten: | 20 | 14.8% | 22 | 15.3% | 16 | 11.2% | 17 | 11.9% | 27 | 18.5% | 22 | 14.4% | 26 | 17.3% |
Grade 1: | 22 | 16.3% | 13 | 9.0% | 21 | 14.7% | 29 | 20.3% | 24 | 16.4% | 23 | 15.0% | 23 | 15.3% |
Grade 2: | 13 | 9.6% | 22 | 15.3% | 27 | 18.9% | 20 | 14.0% | 19 | 13.0% | 25 | 16.3% | 20 | 13.3% |
Grade 3: | 19 | 14.1% | 30 | 20.8% | 22 | 15.4% | 19 | 13.3% | 23 | 15.8% | 26 | 17.0% | 16 | 10.7% |
Grade 4: | 34 | 25.2% | 29 | 20.1% | 26 | 18.2% | 28 | 19.6% | 31 | 21.2% | 20 | 13.1% | 36 | 24.0% |
Grade 5: | 27 | 20.0% | 28 | 19.4% | 31 | 21.7% | 29 | 20.3% | 22 | 15.1% | 37 | 24.2% | 29 | 19.3% |
Ungraded: | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Student By Gender: | ||||||||||||||
Male: | 76 | 56.3% | 81 | 56.3% | 76 | 53.1% | 76 | 53.1% | 72 | 49.3% | 67 | 43.8% | 68 | 45.3% |
Female: | 59 | 43.7% | 63 | 43.8% | 67 | 46.9% | 67 | 46.9% | 74 | 50.7% | 78 | 51.0% | 78 | 52.0% |
Student By Races: | ||||||||||||||
American Indian/Alaska Native: | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 1 | 0.7% | 1 | 0.7% | 3 | 2.0% | 2 | 1.3% |
Asian: | 1 | 0.7% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 2 | 1.4% | 2 | 1.4% | 3 | 2.0% | 2 | 1.3% |
Hispanic: | 4 | 3.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 1 | 0.7% | 1 | 0.7% | 2 | 1.4% | 2 | 1.3% | 0 | 0.0% |
Black: | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 2 | 1.3% |
White: | 130 | 96.3% | 144 | 100.0% | 142 | 99.3% | 139 | 97.2% | 141 | 96.6% | 145 | 94.8% | 144 | 96.0% |
Hawaiian Native/Pacific Islander: | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Two or More Races: | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Lunch Program: | ||||||||||||||
Free Lunch Program Eligible: | 38 | 28.1% | 61 | 42.4% | 67 | 46.9% | 53 | 37.1% | 54 | 37.0% | 45 | 29.4% | 18 | 12.0% |
Reduced-Price Lunch Program Eligible: | 15 | 11.1% | 21 | 14.6% | 13 | 9.1% | 1 | 0.7% | 10 | 6.8% | 19 | 12.4% | 17 | 11.3% |
Student-Teacher Ratio: | 8.13 | 8.23 | 8.36 | 8.88 | 10.00 | 10.10 | 10.60 |
Test Performance
Year | Test | Grade | Measurement | Score | School District | State Average |
NECAP | ||||||
2006 | Mathematics | 3rd Grade | % met std | 51% | 51% | 68% |
2007 | Mathematics | 3rd Grade | % met std | 63% | 63% | 69% |
2008 | Mathematics | 3rd Grade | % met std | 94% | 94% | 73% |
2009 | Mathematics | 3rd Grade | % met std | 68% | 68% | 72% |
2010 | Mathematics | 3rd Grade | % met std | 82% | 82% | 76% |
2011 | Mathematics | 3rd Grade | % met std | 89% | 89% | 76% |
2012 | Mathematics | 3rd Grade | % met std | 87% | 87% | 76% |
2013 | Mathematics | 3rd Grade | % met std | 84% | 84% | 74% |
2006 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 48% | 48% | 71% |
2007 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 89% | 89% | 75% |
2008 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 88% | 88% | 77% |
2009 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 68% | 68% | 78% |
2010 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 68% | 68% | 80% |
2011 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 84% | 84% | 80% |
2012 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 82% | 82% | 81% |
2013 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 80% | 80% | 78% |
2006 | Mathematics | 4th Grade | % met std | 39% | 39% | 65% |
2007 | Mathematics | 4th Grade | % met std | 35% | 35% | 66% |
2008 | Mathematics | 4th Grade | % met std | 75% | 75% | 68% |
2009 | Mathematics | 4th Grade | % met std | 85% | 85% | 73% |
2010 | Mathematics | 4th Grade | % met std | 72% | 72% | 75% |
2011 | Mathematics | 4th Grade | % met std | 71% | 71% | 74% |
2012 | Mathematics | 4th Grade | % met std | 81% | 81% | 76% |
2013 | Mathematics | 4th Grade | % met std | 82% | 82% | 77% |
2006 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 50% | 50% | 69% |
2007 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 45% | 45% | 72% |
2008 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 72% | 72% | 74% |
2009 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 85% | 85% | 75% |
2010 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 72% | 72% | 75% |
2011 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 74% | 74% | 77% |
2012 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 80% | 80% | 79% |
2013 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 66% | 66% | 78% |
2006 | Mathematics | 5th Grade | % met std | 48% | 48% | 63% |
2007 | Mathematics | 5th Grade | % met std | 63% | 63% | 67% |
2008 | Mathematics | 5th Grade | % met std | 40% | 40% | 69% |
2009 | Mathematics | 5th Grade | % met std | 86% | 86% | 73% |
2010 | Mathematics | 5th Grade | % met std | 87% | 87% | 75% |
2011 | Mathematics | 5th Grade | % met std | 50% | 50% | 73% |
2012 | Mathematics | 5th Grade | % met std | 62% | 62% | 76% |
2013 | Mathematics | 5th Grade | % met std | 57% | 57% | 74% |
2006 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 62% | 62% | 67% |
2007 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 67% | 67% | 72% |
2008 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 54% | 54% | 71% |
2009 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 81% | 81% | 76% |
2010 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 91% | 91% | 79% |
2011 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 86% | 86% | 78% |
2012 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 80% | 80% | 77% |
2013 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 82% | 82% | 77% |
2006 | Writing | 5th Grade | % met std | 61% | 61% | 51% |
2007 | Writing | 5th Grade | % met std | 43% | 43% | 50% |
2008 | Writing | 5th Grade | % met std | 37% | 37% | 52% |
2009 | Writing | 5th Grade | % met std | 81% | 81% | 60% |
2011 | Writing | 5th Grade | % met std | 61% | 61% | 56% |
2012 | Writing | 5th Grade | % met std | 55% | 55% | 55% |
2013 | Writing | 5th Grade | % met std | 65% | 65% | 58% |
Some data by SchoolDigger.com.
* Lisbon Regional School (Elem) was rated 3 out of 5 by USA.com. The ranking was calculated based on publically available historical Math and English performance data.